ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 2:  LUIS

Ranking Index = 2,93
 Nacional Acro CBA 4-Minutes 2023, ,
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 4 Minutes, 4-minute Freestyle Sequence
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 Marcio - Suk 10,0 9,0 8,0 10,0 9,0 9,0 10,0 8,0 10,0 9,0 0 3877,60 1
    i 26MX PT-ZSZ 10,29 9,47 8,67 10,37 9,59 9,59 10,21 8,28 10,78 9,64   3814,23    
2 Bolafly - Dec 9,0 8,0 9,0 7,0 8,0 7,0 9,0 9,0 9,0 8,0 0 3533,40 2
    hlon PT-TZT 9,47 8,64 9,52 7,82 8,62 7,64 9,25 9,25 9,64 8,50   3508,84    
3 Balila - Pit 9,0 7,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 7,0 9,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 0 3415,50 4 -1
    S-2B PT-ZOO 9,47 7,81 8,67 8,67 8,62 7,64 9,25 8,28 8,50 8,50   3404,10    
4 Lucas - Ext 9,0 9,0 7,0 8,0 7,0 8,0 7,0 8,0 7,0 7,0 0 3279,67 6 -2
    300 PR-ZYY 9,47 9,47 7,82 8,67 7,64 8,62 7,31 8,28 7,36 7,36   3282,39    
5 Hernani - CAP 6,0 6,0 9,0 8,0 9,0 9,0 8,0 9,0 8,0 8,0 0 3432,40 3 +2
    0B PP-CHA 6,98 6,98 9,52 8,67 9,59 8,63 8,28 9,25 8,50 8,50   3386,27    
6 Pedro - Pit 8,0 7,0 7,0 6,0 9,0 7,0 10,0 7,0 8,0 8,0 0 3317,42 5 +1
    S-2B PT-ZOO 8,64 7,81 7,82 6,97 9,59 7,64 10,16 7,31 8,50 8,50   3316,34    
7 Christiano - Ext 6,0 7,0 7,0 5,0 7,0 6,0 8,0 6,0 7,0 7,0 0 2891,59 8 -1
    300 PR-ZYY 6,98 7,81 7,82 6,12 7,64 6,67 8,28 6,34 7,36 7,36   3131,22    
8 Mencacci - Pit 7,0 7,0 7,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 7,0 0 3160,57 7 +1
    S-1S PT-ZUV 7,81 7,81 7,82 6,97 7,64 8,15 8,28 8,28 8,50 7,36   3161,90    
9 Rambo - Pit 7,0 8,0 6,0 8,0 6,0 6,0 6,0 7,0 6,0 6,0 0 2858,93 9
    S-2A PT-ZMM 7,81 8,64 6,97 8,67 6,67 6,67 6,34 7,31 6,22 6,22   2908,76    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   8
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 28 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - 1    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - 2  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 2 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,71, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2,30 Panel average mark = 8,27, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2,18
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Christiano Extra 300 3131,22 -   3263,52 132,30     8     7     - 1     1,02 34,70%
Lucas Extra 300 3282,39 -   3398,52 116,13     6     4     - 2     0,78 26,50%
Hernani CAP 10B 3386,27 -   3345,08 41,19     3     5     + 2     0,59 20,10%
Mencacci Pitts S-1S 3161,90 -   3130,73 31,17     7     8     + 1     0,42 14,20%
Balila Pitts S-2B 3404,10 -   3429,09 24,99     4     3     - 1     0,11 3,80%
Pedro Pitts S-2B 3316,34 -   3328,48 12,14     5     6     + 1     0,02 0,60%
                  2,93    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Marcio Sukhoi 26MX 3814,23   3652,34 161,89     1     1            
Bolafly Decathlon 3508,84   3507,57 1,27     2     2            
Rambo Pitts S-2A 2908,76   2876,06 32,70     9     9            
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 12/07/23